92 THE MATHEMATICAL PRINCIPLES difficulty of executing everything with accuracy. It was not easy to let go the two pendulums so exactly together that the bodies should impinge one upon the other in the lowermost place AB ; nor to mark the places s, and ky to which the bodies ascended after congress. Nay, and some errors, too, might have happened from the unequal density of the parts of the pen dulous bodies themselves, and from the irregularity of the texture pro ceeding from other causes. But to prevent an objection that may perhaps be alledged against the rule, for the proof of which this experiment was made, as if this rule did suppose that the bodies were either absolutely hard, or at least perfectly elastic (whereas no such bodies are to be found in nature), 1 must add. that the experiments we have been describing, by no means depending upon that quality of hardness, do succeed as well in soft as in hard bodies. For if the rule is to be tried in bodies not perfectly hard, we are only to di minish the reflexion in such a certain proportion as the quantity of the elastic force requires. By the theory of Wren and Huygens, bodies abso lutely hard return one from another with the same velocity with which they meet. But this may be affirmed with more certainty of bodies per fectly elastic. In bodies imperfectly elastic the velocity of the return is to be diminished together with the elastic force ; because that force (except when the parts of bodies are bruised by their congress, or suffer some such extension as happens under the strokes of a hammer) is (as far as I can per ceive) certain and determined, and makes the bodies to return one from the other with a relative velocity, which is in a given ratio to that relative velocity with which they met. This I tried in balls of wool, made up tightly, and strongly compressed. For, first, by letting go the pendulous bodies, and measuring their reflexion, I determined the quantity of their elastic force ; and then, according to this force, estimated the reflexions that ought to happen in other cases of congress. And with this computa tion other experiments made afterwards did accordingly agree ; the balls always receding one from the other with a relative velocity, which was to the relative velocity with which they met as about 5 to 9. Balls of steel returned with almost the same velocity : those of cork with a velocity some-^ thing less ; but in balls of glass the proportion was as about 15 to 16. And thus the third Law, so far as it regards percussions and reflexions, is proved by a theory exactly agreeing with experience. In attractions, I briefly demonstrate the thing after this manner. Sup pose an obstacle is interposed to hinder the congress of any two bodies A. B, mutually attracting one the other : then if either body, as A, is more attracted towards the other body B, than that other body B is towards the first body A, the obstacle will be more strongly urged by the pressure of the body A than by the pressure of the body B, and therefore will not remain in equilibrio : but the stronger pressure will prevail, and will make the system of the two bodies, together with the obstacle, to move directly